Q1: Why do style guides advise journalists against using "outrageous"?
Editorial guides like the AP Stylebook caution against subjective, loaded words like "outrageous" because they tell the reader how to feel instead of reporting the facts. Using specific terms like "unprecedented," "unauthorized," or "flagrant" anchors the story in concrete actions rather than vague editorial opinion.
Q2: What is the primary difference between "egregious" and "flagrant"?
While both describe serious violations, "egregious" focuses on how remarkably bad or offensive an act is in comparison to ordinary standards. "Flagrant" emphasizes that the transgression was committed openly, boldly, and with blatant disregard for the rules.
Q3: How do editors choose between "appalling" and "preposterous"?
Editors select "preposterous" when the subject matter is ridiculous, illogical, or bizarre, inviting reader amusement and derision. They reserve "appalling" for situations involving real suffering, ethical collapse, or institutional neglect that provoke moral indignation.
